If you want to invest next year, check out these big companies for sale on OpenSooq. In recent years, we have seen how many businesses have closed and put their businesses up for sale due to the bad economy in the world. But while some had to sell their business, others managed to buy it and thrive. While we can`t really deny that “one man`s flesh is another man`s poison,” there are some things that could kill your business, even if the economy is safe, like unnecessary expansion, dubious management, and too much debt. However, if you have saved money and want to invest in 2019, we recommend that you consider one of the following industries. In its response to the agency`s request for dismissal, KLG claims that, based on information and beliefs, the winner of the award is in fact a Kuwaiti company affiliated with a registered Iraqi company that has no Iraqi employees. Additional response of the demonstrator to the request for dismissal of the agency to 6. To be able to protest against a federal contract, a demonstrator must be an interested party, that is, an actual or potential supplier whose direct economic interest would be affected by the award or non-award of a contract. Bid Disputes Regulations, 4 C.F.R. Section 21.0(a) (2008). Given that, as already mentioned, klG has been duly classified as KLG not eligible for the award because it is not an Iraqi company and because there are other suppliers that responded to the tender with a more direct economic interest in challenging the eligibility of the successful bidder, it is not interested in challenging the award to another supplier. We agree with the protester that the wording of the request does not explicitly exclude non-Iraqi companies from competition; the only provision contained in the invitation to restrict competition — DFARS sect.

252-225-7026 — requires the contractor to provide Iraqi goods and services, but does not address the origin of the contractor. Notwithstanding this conclusion, we find no reason to object to the Agency`s actions, as we believe that the law gives Iraqi companies the power to restrict competition, and the records show that the Agency intended to do so. In this regard, according to the law, a source comes from Iraq if it is in Iraq (and offers products or services from Iraq). The agency interprets this wording as referring only to Iraqi companies, and we agree with that interpretation. First, it is not only consistent with the plain language of the law, but also with its underlying purpose – because of its ongoing ties to Iraq, an Iraqi company can reasonably be considered more likely than a non-Iraqi company to create a stable source of jobs in Iraq. See Publ. L. 110-181, para.

886 letters a and b number 2. [2] In addition, the alternative interpretation of the demonstrator – which refers from Iraq and Iraq to sources operating in Iraq – based on a term – operating – which in fact does not occur. If that was the intention behind the action, it could easily have been expressed through the use of that term or other similar language. See e.B. AlliedBarton Sec. Serts. LLC, B`299929 et al., 9 October 2007, 2007 CPD para. 175 (the Stafford Act establishes preference for enterprises that primarily reside or do business in the affected area. .

. . The army forwarded the request to several companies, but not to the protesters, because it knew that KLG was not an Iraqi company, but a Kuwaiti company based in Kuwait. Application for dismissal from the Agency, Encl. 1, to 1. KLG submits that it should have been allowed to compete under the Request for Proposals. In this context, KLG cites the language of the DFARS sect. 252-225-7026, which is included in the application and only requires that the contractors use services or products from Iraq or Afghanistan in the performance of a contract, and not that the contractor be an Iraqi company. KLG also argues that the legal language of one or more particular Iraqi sources should be interpreted as including companies operating in Iraq.

Additional response of the demonstrator to the request for dismissal of the agency to 1. KLG concludes that since it operates in Iraq and intends to use Iraqi products and services, it meets the requirements of Article 252-225-7026 of the DFARS and should therefore be in competition. Response of the demonstrator to the request for dismissal, at 2. The request of 17. February 2009 solicited proposals for additional tent shelters and survival equipment in Camp Bucca, Iraq, to support a Military Relief (RIP) in which approximately 1,600 military personnel travel to Iraq to replace units that have performed their military duties in Iraq. .